From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: hwpoison merge for linux-next / 2.6.32 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:06:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20090810100602.GC6838@basil.fritz.box> References: <20090807084902.GA14309@basil.fritz.box> <20090810194528.a3bc0cbc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090810095535.GB6838@basil.fritz.box> <20090810200025.a32000be.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:37956 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753505AbZHJKGC (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:06:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090810200025.a32000be.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andi Kleen , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 08:00:25PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andi, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:55:35 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus or in this > > > case, Ingo, (or ask him to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you > > > > This is practially all generic MM or VFS code, nothing for Ingo. > > Sorry, cut and paste error, it should have read: I see you have a template for this. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). Yes it is (unless someone finds a fatal bug in the current version) It's still not clear if I should do that or let Andrew do it. Andrew, what do you prefer? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.