From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1MaWnU-0008PQ-Qx for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:28 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaWnT-0008NO-Nu for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaWnO-0008F3-C9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52157 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaWnN-0008E9-W7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:22 -0400 Received: from xvm-190-8.ghst.net ([217.70.190.8]:58374 helo=aybabtu.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaWnN-0000mC-6T for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.10.10] (helo=thorin) by aybabtu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MaWnL-0003Yq-KA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:28:19 +0200 Received: from rmh by thorin with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MaWnK-0002yO-Ux for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:28:18 +0200 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:28:18 +0200 From: Robert Millan To: The development of GRUB 2 Message-ID: <20090810152818.GD11134@thorin> References: <1248955606.6598.51.camel@fz.local> <4A719AA4.3000905@gmail.com> <1248968735.27471.40.camel@mj> <20090731161958.GJ14675@thorin> <1249910726.3579.12.camel@fz.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1249910726.3579.12.camel@fz.local> Organization: free as in freedom X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Thunderbird! www.mozilla.com/thunderbird X-Debbugs-No-Ack: true User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:28:28 -0000 On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:25:26PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully > > > > > comes before December) > > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > > > > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that > > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how > > > Debian can have any problem with that. > > > > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say anything > > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. > > > > I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to the > > truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I think we > > should make the website give a clear message that: > > > > a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it > > > > b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy > > > > Good idea. I just think that I'm not good at proposing a good wording > for it. > And maybe we should wait untill 1.97 gets released before telling grub2 > is more mature then grub-legacy. Agreed. We don't want to lead anyone into using 1.96. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."