From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.173.5] (helo=vms173005pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MagfG-0006de-N3 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:00:38 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.255.235.240]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KO600BICVHA0WN3@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:44:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22FAC14AF5F; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:43:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:43:58 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20090811014358.GA8250@denix.org> References: <20090810205124.GA15812@gmail.com> <4A80976B.6020108@soundmetrics.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4A80976B.6020108@soundmetrics.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Missing OMAP35x_Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_3_00_00_08.bin during libgles-omap3_3.00.00.08.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:00:38 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:55:55PM -0700, John Faith wrote: > Khem Raj wrote: >> ... >> It seems like this file >> /home/kraj/work/oe/openembedded/recipes/powervr-drivers/libgles-omap3/OMAP35x_Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_3_00_00_08.bin >> is missing in my case. >> >> Where should it come from > > The Graphics SDK installer must be downloaded from Ti and manually put in > place before building libgles: > http://code.google.com/p/beagleboard/wiki/HowtoUseSGXunderAngstrom By the way, should it be done the same way as DVSDK - i.e. expect the installer in the downloads/ instead of the recipes/? Which way is better? Denys