From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What happened to data=guarded? (was: ext3: Update Kconfig description of EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:37:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090811133721.GD29224@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908111535.37927.elendil@planet.nl>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:35:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The old description for this configuration option was perhaps not
> > completely balanced in terms of describing the tradeoffs of using a
> > default of data=writeback vs. data=ordered.
>
> Somewhat unrelated, but what happened to the data=guarded patches Chris
> Mason proposed back in April?
I missed 2.6.31 but plan on sending for 2.6.32. I promised to send
along a forward port of the patches a while back, but I finally have one
in testing here. It should go out shortly.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-10 20:03 [PATCH, RFC] ext3: Update Kconfig description of EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED Theodore Ts'o
2009-08-10 20:28 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-10 20:55 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-11 3:49 ` Al Boldi
2009-08-11 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-11 11:41 ` Al Boldi
2009-08-11 13:35 ` What happened to data=guarded? (was: ext3: Update Kconfig description of EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED) Frans Pop
2009-08-11 13:37 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-08-11 14:54 ` What happened to data=guarded? Frans Pop
2009-08-11 15:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-11 15:34 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-11 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-11 18:57 ` Theodore Tso
2009-08-10 16:42 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-10 16:42 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-11 22:00 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2009-08-12 20:37 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-11 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-11 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090811133721.GD29224@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.