From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] cache-miss and cache-refs events on P6-mobile CPUs
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:56:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090811165614.GA7529@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090811155052.GB5315@sig21.net>
* Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Could you try the patch below, does it do the trick? Note, since
> > there's just two generic counters and perf stat uses four counters,
> > you'll need to run longer commands than 'true' or something like:
> >
> > perf stat -a sleep 1
> >
> > or:
> >
> > perf stat --repeat 10 /bin/ls -R /usr/bin >/dev/null
> >
> > to get all counters excercised and time-shared on your CPU.
>
> OK, here are the results:
>
> # ./perf stat -a true
>
> Performance counter stats for 'true':
>
> 1.332145 task-clock-msecs # 1.057 CPUs
> 4 context-switches # 0.003 M/sec
> 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
> 121 page-faults # 0.091 M/sec
> 788333 cycles # 591.777 M/sec
> 610408 instructions # 0.774 IPC
> <not counted> cache-references
> <not counted> cache-misses
>
> 0.001260775 seconds time elapsed
>
> # ./perf stat -a sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
>
> 1001.358010 task-clock-msecs # 1.000 CPUs
> 253 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec
> 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
> 145 page-faults # 0.000 M/sec
> 8841883 cycles # 8.830 M/sec (scaled from 85.04%)
> 6361047 instructions # 0.719 IPC (scaled from 78.03%)
> 801847 cache-references # 0.801 M/sec (scaled from 14.96%)
> 16925 cache-misses # 0.017 M/sec (scaled from 21.97%)
>
> 1.001540692 seconds time elapsed
>
> # ./perf stat --repeat 10 /bin/ls -R /usr/bin >/dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls -R /usr/bin' (10 runs):
>
> 8.642859 task-clock-msecs # 0.939 CPUs ( +- 2.382% )
> 1 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 375 page-faults # 0.043 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 14796621 cycles # 1712.005 M/sec ( +- 0.306% )
> 15526008 instructions # 1.049 IPC ( +- 0.020% )
> <not counted> cache-references
> <not counted> cache-misses
>
> 0.009207932 seconds time elapsed ( +- 4.020% )
>
> # ./perf stat --repeat 10 /bin/ls -lR /usr/bin >/dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls -lR /usr/bin' (10 runs):
>
> 49.894190 task-clock-msecs # 0.762 CPUs ( +- 8.231% )
> 45 context-switches # 0.001 M/sec ( +- 52.174% )
> 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 476 page-faults # 0.010 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 81036819 cycles # 1624.173 M/sec ( +- 3.166% ) (scaled from 96.03%)
> 88822455 instructions # 1.096 IPC ( +- 2.108% ) (scaled from 96.42%)
> 573228 cache-references # 11.489 M/sec ( +- 37.947% )
> <not counted> cache-misses
>
> 0.065464625 seconds time elapsed ( +- 19.349% )
>
> # ./perf stat --repeat 10 /bin/ls -R /usr/lib >/dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls -R /usr/lib' (10 runs):
>
> 136.771643 task-clock-msecs # 0.075 CPUs ( +- 19.292% )
> 757 context-switches # 0.006 M/sec ( +- 56.332% )
> 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 343 page-faults # 0.003 M/sec ( +- 0.000% )
> 173125500 cycles # 1265.800 M/sec ( +- 5.034% ) (scaled from 78.21%)
> 174597635 instructions # 1.009 IPC ( +- 1.829% ) (scaled from 78.34%)
> 2441413 cache-references # 17.850 M/sec ( +- 18.289% ) (scaled from 21.79%)
> 21112 cache-misses # 0.154 M/sec ( +- 11.183% ) (scaled from 21.66%)
>
> 1.824204481 seconds time elapsed ( +- 29.781% )
Ok, this all looks pretty good!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-07 17:09 2.6.31-rc5 regression: x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-09 10:03 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-09 10:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-09 16:47 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-10 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-10 12:27 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-10 12:32 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-10 12:56 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-10 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 19:26 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-10 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-10 20:05 ` Robert Richter
2009-08-10 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 20:37 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-10 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 22:13 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-11 9:34 ` [patch] cache-miss and cache-refs events on P6-mobile CPUs Ingo Molnar
2009-08-11 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-11 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-11 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-11 15:50 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-11 16:56 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-08-11 15:40 ` 2.6.31-rc5 regression: x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-17 14:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-12 11:59 ` *PING* [PATCH]: x86: mce: fix mce warning with disabled lapic Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090811165614.GA7529@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=js@sig21.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.