From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typos in git-remote.txt and git-symbolic-ref.txt Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:40:08 +0200 Message-ID: <200908121540.09784.trast@student.ethz.ch> References: <20090811005207.GE24183@headley> <200908110909.33904.trast@student.ethz.ch> <200908111826.12338.wjl@icecavern.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?utf-8?q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_N=C4=9Bmec?= , To: "Wesley J. Landaker" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 12 15:40:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MbE4H-0006Tq-S7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:40:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751676AbZHLNkc (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:40:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751187AbZHLNkc (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:40:32 -0400 Received: from gwse.ethz.ch ([129.132.178.237]:43905 "EHLO gwse.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751177AbZHLNkb (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:40:31 -0400 Received: from CAS02.d.ethz.ch (129.132.178.236) by gws00.d.ethz.ch (129.132.178.237) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:40:31 +0200 Received: from thomas.localnet (129.132.153.233) by mail.ethz.ch (129.132.178.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:40:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.27.25-0.1-default; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <200908111826.12338.wjl@icecavern.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > On Tuesday 11 August 2009 01:09:32 Thomas Rast wrote: > > instances of `-- [...] > Obviously we want consistency, but--as this sentence shows--there is a > difference between an em-dash and a command-line option like --version. Note the backtick. This is solely about `--options` vs. `\--options`, and I highly doubt anyone would want their em-dashes to be typeset in fixed-width font (that's what the backticks do). -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch