From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Md4Er-0000mv-90
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:35:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Md4Em-0000mK-Rf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:35:12 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48556 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md4Em-0000mH-JD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:35:08 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33038)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>) id 1Md4Em-0004ED-1O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:35:08 -0400
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:35:05 +0200
From: Reimar =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=F6ffinger?= <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] enable vmmouse on x86_64
Message-ID: <20090817153505.GA339@1und1.de>
References: <20090817144316.GA31191@1und1.de>
 <4A89710D.5050700@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4A89710D.5050700@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:02:37PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Reimar Döffinger schrieb:
> > Hello,
> > I see no reason why vmmouse should be disabled on x86_64, I guess this
> > was just forgotten - attached trivial patch changes it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
> 
> Are you sure this is needed? If I'm not mistaken, TARGET_I386 is set for
> x86_64 as well.

Yes, you are right, sorry. Please disregard this one.