From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.173.11] (helo=vms173011pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdE0w-0004A6-Ob for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:01:30 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.255.235.240]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KOJ00IOYU5C3UH6@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:44:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D5C914AF5F; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:43:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:43:59 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20090818014359.GC18879@denix.org> References: <4A7D824D.7080103@balister.org> <1249899969.8248.95.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <4A800434.4050603@balister.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4A800434.4050603@balister.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: OEDEM scheduling X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:01:31 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:27:48AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote: > Phil Blundell wrote: >> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the >> doodle poll. (October was second best; September was least favoured, >> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away >> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.) So, I would suggest >> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new >> alternatives at this stage. Either way, it'd be good to try to get the >> date nailed down within the >> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice. Obviously >> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably >> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes. > > Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates? Any updates on this item? -- Denys