From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:59:03 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20090818085903.GN3168@ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <20090818081041.GL3168@ma.tech.ascom.ch> <200908181051.10826.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908181051.10826.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv applying for an official Ethertype? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking > We know about it. Nobody gave us the money yet... and I think it will never > happen that a rich boy come to us and give us that money just for 16 bit... The fee is about equivalent to 3 man days of work. So its not that big a sum for a commercial entity wanting to use batman in a product. However, when i posed this question, i had Linux mainline in the back of my head. Would batman get into mainline when it is using an unofficial ethertype? I guess i need to see if any other protocol is using an unofficial ethertype. Andrew