From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 08/27] zfcp: fix layering oddities between zfcp_fsf and zfcp_qdio
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:43:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090818135029.794391000@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090818134305.841868000@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: 709-zfcp-odd-layers.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7906 bytes --]
From: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
There is no need for the QDIO layer to have knowledge or do things
wich are done better by the FSF layer and vice versa. Straighten a
few things to improve vividness.
Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h | 2
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c | 45 ------------------
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h 2009-08-17 11:29:13.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h 2009-08-17 11:29:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -133,11 +133,11 @@ extern int zfcp_fsf_send_ct(struct zfcp_
extern int zfcp_fsf_send_els(struct zfcp_send_els *);
extern int zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task(struct zfcp_unit *,
struct scsi_cmnd *);
-extern void zfcp_fsf_req_complete(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
extern void zfcp_fsf_req_free(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
extern struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_ctm(struct zfcp_unit *, u8);
extern struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command(unsigned long,
struct zfcp_unit *);
+extern void zfcp_fsf_reqid_check(struct zfcp_adapter *, int);
/* zfcp_qdio.c */
extern int zfcp_qdio_allocate(struct zfcp_adapter *);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-08-17 11:29:11.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-08-17 11:29:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -122,35 +122,6 @@ void zfcp_fsf_req_free(struct zfcp_fsf_r
}
}
-/**
- * zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all - dismiss all fsf requests
- * @adapter: pointer to struct zfcp_adapter
- *
- * Never ever call this without shutting down the adapter first.
- * Otherwise the adapter would continue using and corrupting s390 storage.
- * Included BUG_ON() call to ensure this is done.
- * ERP is supposed to be the only user of this function.
- */
-void zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
-{
- struct zfcp_fsf_req *req, *tmp;
- unsigned long flags;
- LIST_HEAD(remove_queue);
- unsigned int i;
-
- BUG_ON(atomic_read(&adapter->status) & ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_QDIOUP);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
- for (i = 0; i < REQUEST_LIST_SIZE; i++)
- list_splice_init(&adapter->req_list[i], &remove_queue);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &remove_queue, list) {
- list_del(&req->list);
- req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_DISMISSED;
- zfcp_fsf_req_complete(req);
- }
-}
-
static void zfcp_fsf_status_read_port_closed(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
{
struct fsf_status_read_buffer *sr_buf = req->data;
@@ -459,7 +430,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_protstatus_eval(str
* is called to process the completion status and trigger further
* events related to the FSF request.
*/
-void zfcp_fsf_req_complete(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
+static void zfcp_fsf_req_complete(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
{
if (unlikely(req->fsf_command == FSF_QTCB_UNSOLICITED_STATUS)) {
zfcp_fsf_status_read_handler(req);
@@ -492,6 +463,35 @@ void zfcp_fsf_req_complete(struct zfcp_f
wake_up(&req->completion_wq);
}
+/**
+ * zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all - dismiss all fsf requests
+ * @adapter: pointer to struct zfcp_adapter
+ *
+ * Never ever call this without shutting down the adapter first.
+ * Otherwise the adapter would continue using and corrupting s390 storage.
+ * Included BUG_ON() call to ensure this is done.
+ * ERP is supposed to be the only user of this function.
+ */
+void zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ struct zfcp_fsf_req *req, *tmp;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ LIST_HEAD(remove_queue);
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&adapter->status) & ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_QDIOUP);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
+ for (i = 0; i < REQUEST_LIST_SIZE; i++)
+ list_splice_init(&adapter->req_list[i], &remove_queue);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &remove_queue, list) {
+ list_del(&req->list);
+ req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_DISMISSED;
+ zfcp_fsf_req_complete(req);
+ }
+}
+
static int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_evaluate(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
{
struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config *bottom;
@@ -2578,3 +2578,43 @@ out:
}
return ERR_PTR(retval);
}
+
+/**
+ * zfcp_fsf_reqid_check - validate req_id contained in SBAL returned by QDIO
+ * @adapter: pointer to struct zfcp_adapter
+ * @sbal_idx: response queue index of SBAL to be processed
+ */
+void zfcp_fsf_reqid_check(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, int sbal_idx)
+{
+ struct qdio_buffer *sbal = adapter->resp_q.sbal[sbal_idx];
+ struct qdio_buffer_element *sbale;
+ struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req;
+ unsigned long flags, req_id;
+ int idx;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < QDIO_MAX_ELEMENTS_PER_BUFFER; idx++) {
+
+ sbale = &sbal->element[idx];
+ req_id = (unsigned long) sbale->addr;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
+ fsf_req = zfcp_reqlist_find(adapter, req_id);
+
+ if (!fsf_req)
+ /*
+ * Unknown request means that we have potentially memory
+ * corruption and must stop the machine immediately.
+ */
+ panic("error: unknown req_id (%lx) on adapter %s.\n",
+ req_id, dev_name(&adapter->ccw_device->dev));
+
+ list_del(&fsf_req->list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
+
+ fsf_req->sbal_response = sbal_idx;
+ fsf_req->qdio_inb_usage = atomic_read(&adapter->resp_q.count);
+ zfcp_fsf_req_complete(fsf_req);
+
+ if (likely(sbale->flags & SBAL_FLAGS_LAST_ENTRY))
+ break;
+ }
+}
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c 2009-08-17 11:28:54.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c 2009-08-17 11:29:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -112,31 +112,6 @@ static void zfcp_qdio_int_req(struct ccw
wake_up(&adapter->request_wq);
}
-static void zfcp_qdio_reqid_check(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
- unsigned long req_id, int sbal_idx)
-{
- struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
- fsf_req = zfcp_reqlist_find(adapter, req_id);
-
- if (!fsf_req)
- /*
- * Unknown request means that we have potentially memory
- * corruption and must stop the machine immediatly.
- */
- panic("error: unknown request id (%lx) on adapter %s.\n",
- req_id, dev_name(&adapter->ccw_device->dev));
-
- zfcp_reqlist_remove(adapter, fsf_req);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
-
- fsf_req->sbal_response = sbal_idx;
- fsf_req->qdio_inb_usage = atomic_read(&adapter->resp_q.count);
- zfcp_fsf_req_complete(fsf_req);
-}
-
static void zfcp_qdio_resp_put_back(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, int processed)
{
struct zfcp_qdio_queue *queue = &adapter->resp_q;
@@ -163,9 +138,7 @@ static void zfcp_qdio_int_resp(struct cc
unsigned long parm)
{
struct zfcp_adapter *adapter = (struct zfcp_adapter *) parm;
- struct zfcp_qdio_queue *queue = &adapter->resp_q;
- struct qdio_buffer_element *sbale;
- int sbal_idx, sbale_idx, sbal_no;
+ int sbal_idx, sbal_no;
if (unlikely(qdio_err)) {
zfcp_hba_dbf_event_qdio(adapter, qdio_err, first, count);
@@ -179,22 +152,8 @@ static void zfcp_qdio_int_resp(struct cc
*/
for (sbal_no = 0; sbal_no < count; sbal_no++) {
sbal_idx = (first + sbal_no) % QDIO_MAX_BUFFERS_PER_Q;
-
/* go through all SBALEs of SBAL */
- for (sbale_idx = 0; sbale_idx < QDIO_MAX_ELEMENTS_PER_BUFFER;
- sbale_idx++) {
- sbale = zfcp_qdio_sbale(queue, sbal_idx, sbale_idx);
- zfcp_qdio_reqid_check(adapter,
- (unsigned long) sbale->addr,
- sbal_idx);
- if (likely(sbale->flags & SBAL_FLAGS_LAST_ENTRY))
- break;
- };
-
- if (unlikely(!(sbale->flags & SBAL_FLAGS_LAST_ENTRY)))
- dev_warn(&adapter->ccw_device->dev,
- "A QDIO protocol error occurred, "
- "operations continue\n");
+ zfcp_fsf_reqid_check(adapter, sbal_idx);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-18 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 13:43 [patch 00/27] zfcp updates for 2.6.32 Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 01/27] zfcp: invalid usage after free of port resources Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 02/27] zfcp: Move debug data from zfcp_data to own data structure Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 03/27] zfcp: Only collect SCSI debug data for matching trace levels Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 04/27] zfcp: Only collect FSF/HBA " Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 05/27] zfcp: Remove useless assignment Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 06/27] zfcp: Only issue one test link command per port Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 07/27] zfcp: Implicitly close all wka ports Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` Christof Schmitt [this message]
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 09/27] zfcp: Replace fsf_req wait_queue with completion Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 10/27] zfcp: Improve request allocation through mempools Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 11/27] zfcp: Remove the useless ZFCP_REQ_AUTO_CLEANUP flag Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 12/27] zfcp: Move workqueue to adapter struct Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 13/27] zfcp: Separate qdio attributes from zfcp_fsf_req Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 14/27] zfcp: Move qdio related data out of zfcp_adapter Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 15/27] zfcp: Decouple gid_pn requests from erp Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 16/27] zfcp: Update dbf calls Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 17/27] zfcp: introduce _setup, _destroy for qdio and FC Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 18/27] zfcp: Apply common naming conventions to zfcp_fc Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 19/27] zfcp: resolve false usage of dd_data in fc_rport Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 20/27] zfcp: Use kthread API for zfcp erp thread Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 21/27] zfcp: Simplify and update ct/gs and els timeout handling Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 22/27] zfcp: Defer resource allocation to first ccw_set_online call Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 23/27] zfcp: Replace config semaphore with mutex Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 24/27] zfcp: proper use of device register Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 25/27] zfcp: Handle failures during device allocation correctly Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 26/27] zfcp: Remove duplicated code for debug timestamps Christof Schmitt
2009-08-18 13:43 ` [patch 27/27] zfcp: optimize zfcp_qdio_account Christof Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090818135029.794391000@de.ibm.com \
--to=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=swen@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.