From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:37:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20090819103755.GC27405@elte.hu> References: <20090819160758.f23f2e8a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:51931 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751252AbZHSKiH (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:38:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090819160758.f23f2e8a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > kernel/irq/manage.c between commit > 69ab849439b506cd8dd2879527fdb64d95dd5211 ("genirq: Wake up irq thread > after action has been installed") from Linus' tree and commit > 3c26caa7409ad5367b257de3d7943551d4a959ee ("genirq: Do not wakeup irq > thread from __setup_irq() and set action->irq") from the tip tree. > > I used the version from Linus' tree (as seems to have been done in > tip:master). Yeah - that's the right resolution - thanks Stephen. Ingo