From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.173.19] (helo=vms173019pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Me27I-0001QN-12 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:31:24 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.255.235.240]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KON00AN5YRHDY05@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:14:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5252714AF5F; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:14:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:14:02 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20090820071402.GB459@denix.org> References: <4A7D824D.7080103@balister.org> <1249899969.8248.95.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <4A800434.4050603@balister.org> <20090818014359.GC18879@denix.org> <1250595439.27980.66.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <1250595439.27980.66.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: OEDEM scheduling X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:31:24 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:43 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:27:48AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote: > > > Phil Blundell wrote: > > >> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the > > >> doodle poll. (October was second best; September was least favoured, > > >> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away > > >> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.) So, I would suggest > > >> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new > > >> alternatives at this stage. Either way, it'd be good to try to get the > > >> date nailed down within the > > >> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice. Obviously > > >> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably > > >> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes. > > > > > > Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates? > > > > Any updates on this item? > > I think the original proposal was for either Berlin or Frankfurt. > Failing that I could probably arrange to host something in Cambridge so > long as the number of attendees isn't too enormous. I was trying to find out about the actual place, rather than location... :) -- Denys