From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1751967AbZHTSvF@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751967AbZHTSvF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:51:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751862AbZHTSvE
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:51:04 -0400
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43604 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751735AbZHTSvD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:51:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:48:47 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>,
       Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
       "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
       bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
       bero@arklinux.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Work around yet another BIOS bug
Message-Id: <20090820114847.9dc35d82.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1250766877.11523.1.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
References: <bug-14003-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
	<20090819142634.0fc550d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<1250754748.8974.17.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	<1250755318.8974.26.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	<20090820024453.dd9909a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<1250766877.11523.1.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:14:37 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 02:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Printing a u64 with %ll will (still) generate a warning on four
> > architectures.
> 
> Still that many? I thought we'd fixed them all already.

You're right, they all seem to be fixed.  Nobody tells me nuttin.  Whee.