From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7MKFBmc011384 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:15:27 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 051803EE6BB for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id h1WogRCUtwQz2OUe for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:15:59 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6) Message-ID: <20090822201558.GA17955@infradead.org> References: <00980BBF-1206-4BEF-A8AE-B4A8DAE7EC27@sgi.com> <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> <20090822142550.GA10003@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:45:13AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Yes, entirely possible. All the crypto loop / dm implementation used >> to have a tendency to never complete I/O once in a while, although that >> didn't happen anymore recently. > > Ok, > > What is the best way to debug the issue? git bi-sects between 2.6.29.x > and 2.6.31-rc6? or? Well, that would be a good way to find it. But I'm personally not interested in spending much time on debugging a problem if it only happens with fishy out of tree modules. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933351AbZHVUP6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:15:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933329AbZHVUP6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:15:58 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57342 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933304AbZHVUP5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:15:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:15:59 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6) Message-ID: <20090822201558.GA17955@infradead.org> References: <00980BBF-1206-4BEF-A8AE-B4A8DAE7EC27@sgi.com> <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> <20090822142550.GA10003@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:45:13AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Yes, entirely possible. All the crypto loop / dm implementation used >> to have a tendency to never complete I/O once in a while, although that >> didn't happen anymore recently. > > Ok, > > What is the best way to debug the issue? git bi-sects between 2.6.29.x > and 2.6.31-rc6? or? Well, that would be a good way to find it. But I'm personally not interested in spending much time on debugging a problem if it only happens with fishy out of tree modules.