Re: make glib optional

[Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>]

On Sat, 22.08.09 05:36, Marco d'Itri (md@Linux.IT) wrote:

> I do not know how other distributions feel about this, but I fully
> expect to be flamed if I suggested to add 2 MB of glib to the Debian
> base system just to support ConsoleKit's ACLs.

This patch is incredibly ugly, and broken. The most obvious issue is
for example that on Fedora glib is in /lib, and on multilib machines it is
even in /lib64.

If you dislike glib that much then I'd suggest splitting off udev-acl
and the rules files into a seperate package and then have ckit depend
on it. But this explicit check you suggested is just failure.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4