From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752184AbZHXLw7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:52:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751845AbZHXLw6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:52:58 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:50096 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751080AbZHXLw6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:52:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:52:41 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Paul Mundt , Frederic Weisbecker , Josh Stone , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron , Li Zefan , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jiaying Zhang , Martin Bligh , Lai Jiangshan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tracing: Make syscall_(un)regfunc arch-specific Message-ID: <20090824115241.GD10215@elte.hu> References: <1250795373-32363-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1250917125-6174-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1250917125-6174-2-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1250917125-6174-3-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <20090823211422.GG6256@nowhere> <20090824014025.GA12653@linux-sh.org> <20090824084101.GE2424@elte.hu> <20090824085944.GA15330@linux-sh.org> <20090824095652.GC25267@elte.hu> <20090824103251.GA18106@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090824103251.GA18106@linux-sh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Paul Mundt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > So i'd really like you to back up your claims with facts. Your > > mail is basically unsubstantiated FUD right now and i'll just > > ignore you if you continue this pattern of unsubstantiated > > attacks and unconstructive behavior. > > I could sit here and itemize individual breakages all day long, > but what would be the point? [...] The point would be to prove your so far unsubstantiated (and IMO unfair) attacks. Ingo