From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jakov Sosic <jakov.sosic@srce.hr>
Subject: Re: Sun StorageTek 2530 and dm?
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:09:48 +0200
Message-ID: <20090825010948.0b7fa554@pc-jsosic.srce.hr>
References: <20090823210536.4730636d@nb-jsosic>
	<20090823213448.154d6cff@nb-jsosic>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0908241128370.27199@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
	<20090824174834.35a7038f@pc-jsosic.srce.hr>
	<20090824180058.7cc4edcb@pc-jsosic.srce.hr>
	<1251139098.24406.1.camel@chandra-ubuntu>
	<20090824205529.6b78aa3a@pc-jsosic.srce.hr>
	<1251145456.24406.16.camel@chandra-ubuntu>
	<20090824223745.33425c32@pc-jsosic.srce.hr>
	<1251146674.24406.20.camel@chandra-ubuntu>
	<20090824225324.1ee86d9f@pc-jsosic.srce.hr>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0908241852270.21130@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
Reply-To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0908241852270.21130@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
Charlie Brady <charlieb-dm-devel@budge.apana.org.au> wrote:

> Chandra says that the patch won't help you. Perhaps he can clarify.
> My understanding is that if you configure multipath to use RDAC that
> the driver does have to be patched so that the RDAC handler will be
> used. I did find that to be the case with the StorageTek 2510
> "LCMS100_I").
> 
> My understanding also is that RDAC is superior, so RDAC hander
> support is desirable.

Is it enough to just add a new line to the list of the devices? For
example:

const struct scsi_dh_devlist rdac_dev_list[] = {
        {"IBM", "1722"},
        {"IBM", "1724"},
        {"IBM", "1726"},
        {"IBM", "1742"},
        {"IBM", "1814"},
        {"IBM", "1815"},
        {"IBM", "1818"},
        {"IBM", "3526"},
        {"SGI", "TP9400"},
        {"SGI", "TP9500"},
        {"SGI", "IS"},
        {"STK", "OPENstorage D280"},
        {"SUN", "CSM200_R"},
        {"SUN", "LCSM100_F"},
        {"SUN", "LCSM100_I"},
        {"SUN", "LCSM100_S"},
        {NULL, NULL},
};

?


> > Sorry, I'm easily flammable...
> 
> You would be wise to control your urges, if you wish people to help
> you.

Well you misunderstood me both - I was just bashing around, and nothing
was said at neither yours neither his account. It was just because this
project I'm working on is taking so so so long :( This is like 10th
problem I've encountered that is out of my order, and the amount of
user-hours has already 3-4x exceeded the amount of money project
brings :( So I'm really really... angry :-/


-- 
|    Jakov Sosic    |    ICQ: 28410271    |   PGP: 0x965CAE2D   |
=================================================================
| start fighting cancer -> http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/   |