All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:24:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825102409.GK20811@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251194143.7538.1128.camel@twins>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:55:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:31 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:36:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:46 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > > The correct mask that describes core-siblings of an processor
> > > > is topology_core_cpumask. See topology adapation patches, especially
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124964999608179
> > > 
> > > 
> > > argh, violence, murder kill.. this is the worst possible hack and you're
> > > extending it :/
> > 
> > So this is the third code area
> > (besides sched_*_power_savings sysfs interface, and the __cpu_power fiddling)
> > that is crap, mess, a hack.
> > 
> > Didn't know that I'd enter such a minefield when touching this code. ;-(
> 
> Yeah, you're lucky that way ;-) Its been creaking for a while, and I've
> been making noises to the IBM people (who so far have been the main
> source of power saving patches) to clean this up, but now you trod onto
> all of it at once..
> 
> > What would be your perferred solution for the
> > core_cpumask/llc_shared_map stuff?  Another domain level to get rid of
> > this function?
> 
> Right, I'd like to see everything exposed as domain levels.
> 
> 
> numa-cluster
> numa
> socket
> in-socket-numa
> multi-core
> shared-cache
> core
> threads
> 
> We currently have a fixed order of these things, but I think we should
> simply provide helpers for building the sd tree and let the arch code do
> that instead of exporting all these masks in a fixed order.
> 
> Once we get the arch domain tree, we do degenerate stuff to cull all the
> trivial domains and fold SD flags.

So any in-socket-numa is only going to haeppen with the arch-defined
domain tree.

Now that this is settled you should throw away the
__build_sched_domains cleanup patches that are in tip. They won't be
of use when domain creation code is basically changed.


Regards,

Andreas

-- 
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
  System  | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
 Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
  Center  | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
  (OSRC)  | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-20 13:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/15] sched: Fix scheduling for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/15] x86, sched: Add config option for multi-node CPU scheduling Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-21 13:50   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-08-24  8:49     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/15] sched, x86: Provide initializer for MN scheduling domain, define MN level Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/15] sched: Add cpumask to be used when building MN domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/15] sched: Define per CPU variables and cpu_to_group function for " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/15] sched: Add function to build MN sched domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 6/15] sched: Add support for MN domain in build_sched_groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/15] sched: Activate build of MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/15] sched: Add parameter sched_mn_power_savings to control MN domain sched policy Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:32     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-24 15:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  7:52         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  7:50       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  6:24     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  6:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:38         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-26  9:30   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-27 12:47     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 9/15] sched: Check sched_mn_power_savings when setting flags for CPU and MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  9:34     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-26 10:01   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power_savings when doing load balancing Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:40     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-25  8:00       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched: Pass unlimited __cpu_power information to upper domain level groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 16:44     ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-24 17:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:19         ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25  7:11           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:04             ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25  8:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:51     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched: Allow NODE domain to be parent of MC instead of CPU domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:55     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched: Detect child domain of NUMA (aka NODE) domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  9:13     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched: Conditionally limit __cpu_power when child sched domain has type NODE Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  9:19     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:13       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:36         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-27 13:18           ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  9:31     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  9:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 10:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:24         ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-08-25 10:28           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:42             ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-27 15:25         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 10:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-28 12:03             ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 12:50               ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090825102409.GK20811@alberich.amd.com \
    --to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.