From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume (updated) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:44:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20090826154420.GD1338@ucw.cz> References: <200908122218.13975.rjw@sisk.pl> <200908170215.21173.rjw@sisk.pl> <1250579793.5351.79.camel@rzhang-dt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1250579793.5351.79.camel@rzhang-dt> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Zhang Rui Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm , linux-acpi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Len Brown , Alan Stern , Arjan van de Ven , Greg KH List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I still think that the child device should inherit its parent's > async_suspend flag to do the asynchronous resume more efficiently. I really think this should be opt-in. Even if seemingly simple cases like usb devices... there's stuff like olpc where you have usb device and sideband channel.... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html