From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frans Pop Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:33:34 +0200 Message-ID: <200908261833.37310.elendil@planet.nl> References: <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-To: <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Andrew Morton Cc: zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org (Dropped unrelated CCs.) Andrew Morton wrote: > I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14. > > So I merged this patch and shall send it along with > > thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch > acpi-dont-call-acpi_processor_init-if-acpi-is-disabled.patch Thanks for that Andrew. Could you please do the same for my patches in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 (or http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/17/169)? That BR is on the regression list for 2.6.30. The patches apply cleanly to current mainline. Thanks, FJP From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752047AbZHZQdi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:33:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751626AbZHZQdh (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:33:37 -0400 Received: from Cpsmtpm-eml106.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.10]:62808 "EHLO CPSMTPM-EML106.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750749AbZHZQdg (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:33:36 -0400 From: Frans Pop To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:33:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: zajec5@gmail.com, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-reply-To: <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908261833.37310.elendil@planet.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Aug 2009 16:33:37.0495 (UTC) FILETIME=[F659CE70:01CA266A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Dropped unrelated CCs.) Andrew Morton wrote: > I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14. > > So I merged this patch and shall send it along with > > thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch > acpi-dont-call-acpi_processor_init-if-acpi-is-disabled.patch Thanks for that Andrew. Could you please do the same for my patches in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 (or http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/17/169)? That BR is on the regression list for 2.6.30. The patches apply cleanly to current mainline. Thanks, FJP