All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:34:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090827093441.GA3451@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090827160532.d6386722.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On 08/27, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:44:53 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > In the newest mmotom, my S14nfslock hangs up. (x86-64/Fedora10)
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:28:30 -0700
> > akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> >
> > > ptrace-__ptrace_detach-do-__wake_up_parent-if-we-reap-the-tracee.patch
> > > do_wait-wakeup-optimization-shift-security_task_wait-from-eligible_child-to-wait_consider_task.patch
> >
> > bisected. following 2 patches for filtering SIGCHLD cause hang (for my environ).
> >
> > > do_wait-wakeup-optimization-change-__wake_up_parent-to-use-filtered-wakeup.patch
> > > do_wait-wakeup-optimization-change-__wake_up_parent-to-use-filtered-wakeup-selinux_bprm_committed_creds-use-__wake_up_parent.patch

Confused. Which patch causes the hang? They should be applied in reverse order,

	do_wait-wakeup-optimization-change-__wake_up_parent-to-use-filtered-wakeup-selinux_bprm_committed_creds-use-__wake_up_parent.patch
	do_wait-wakeup-optimization-change-__wake_up_parent-to-use-filtered-wakeup.patch

> removed S14nfslockd from rc5.d and check it by strace
> ==
>  2712] fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
> [pid  2712] mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fc6f263c000
> [pid  2712] dup(6)                      = 7
> [pid  2712] write(6, "2712\n"..., 5)    = 5
> [pid  2712] close(6)                    = 0
> [pid  2712] munmap(0x7fc6f263c000, 4096) = 0
> [pid  2712] clone(Process 2713 attached
> child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0x7fc6f2625780) = 2713
> [pid  2712] wait4(2713, Process 2712 suspended
>  <unfinished ...>
> ==
> When process 2713 exits, process 2712 don't wake up.

Hmm, very strange. How can I reproduce?

When the child (2713) exits and the parent hangs, could you send
me the content of /proc/parent_pid/status?

OK, suppose that due to the patch above we lost the notification.
But, wait4 returns -ECHILD, who reaped this child???

What does "$ ps CHILD_PID" say? /proc/child_pid/status please?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-27  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-24 23:28 mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded akpm
2009-08-25 10:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26  4:52   ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-26  6:54     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26  3:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26  3:36   ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-26  3:44     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27  5:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27  6:17   ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-08-27  6:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27  7:05   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27  9:34     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-08-27  9:43       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 10:08         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-27 10:31           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 10:52             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-28 17:17               ` eligible_child() && __WCLONE && task_detached() (Was: mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded) Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-28 19:16                 ` Roland McGrath
2009-09-01 12:22                   ` [PATCH -mm 0/2] fix do_wait(!__WALL) hang " Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-01 12:23                     ` [PATCH -mm 1/2] do_wait-wakeup-optimization: fix child_wait_callback()->eligible_child() usage Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-10  0:36                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-01 12:24                     ` [PATCH -mm 2/2] do_wait-wakeup-optimization: simplify task_pid_type() Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-27 10:17         ` mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27  9:37     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090827093441.GA3451@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.