From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090827150523.837598024@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090827150051.846026837@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3387 bytes --]
cpu_power is supposed to be a representation of the process capacity
of the cpu, not a value to randomly tweak in order to affect
placement.
Remove the placement hacks and add SMT gain.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
include/linux/topology.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
unsigned int newidle_idx;
unsigned int wake_idx;
unsigned int forkexec_idx;
+ unsigned int smt_gain;
int flags; /* See SD_* */
enum sched_domain_level level;
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/topology.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
| SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER, \
.last_balance = jiffies, \
.balance_interval = 1, \
+ .smt_gain = 1178, /* 15% */ \
}
#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8468,15 +8468,13 @@ static void free_sched_groups(const stru
* there are asymmetries in the topology. If there are asymmetries, group
* having more cpu_power will pickup more load compared to the group having
* less cpu_power.
- *
- * cpu_power will be a multiple of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. This multiple represents
- * the maximum number of tasks a group can handle in the presence of other idle
- * or lightly loaded groups in the same sched domain.
*/
static void init_sched_groups_power(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
struct sched_domain *child;
struct sched_group *group;
+ long power;
+ int weight;
WARN_ON(!sd || !sd->groups);
@@ -8487,22 +8485,26 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int
sd->groups->__cpu_power = 0;
- /*
- * For perf policy, if the groups in child domain share resources
- * (for example cores sharing some portions of the cache hierarchy
- * or SMT), then set this domain groups cpu_power such that each group
- * can handle only one task, when there are other idle groups in the
- * same sched domain.
- */
- if (!child || (!(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) &&
- (child->flags &
- (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)))) {
- sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
+ if (!child) {
+ power = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
+ /*
+ * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
+ * Usually multiple threads get a better yield out of
+ * that one core than a single thread would have,
+ * reflect that in sd->smt_gain.
+ */
+ if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
+ power *= sd->smt_gain;
+ power /= weight;
+ power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
+ }
+ sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
return;
}
/*
- * add cpu_power of each child group to this groups cpu_power
+ * Add cpu_power of each child group to this groups cpu_power.
*/
group = child->groups;
do {
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-27 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 15:00 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] load-balancing and cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-27 15:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-28 18:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] load-balancing and cpu_power Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090827150523.837598024@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.