From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng " <yanzheng@21cn.com>
Cc: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhu Yanhai <yanhai.zhu@linux.intel.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make radix_tree_preload alloc one more slot
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:31:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828033149.GA24838@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d0408630908271933v1d136b85he33e7d4b6e0bccf6@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:33:03AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:46:46AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >> 2009/8/27 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Yanhai,
> >> >
> >> > [Nick CCed]
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 08:10:41PM +0800, Zhu Yanhai wrote:
> >> >> The operations against radix tree always use paths with RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH
> >> >> + 1 slots, but radix_tree_preload only pre-allocs RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH
> >> >> slots at present, which causes radix_tree_node_alloc tries to do
> >> >> kmem_cache_alloc at the last slot even if we don't have gfp_mask &
> >> >> __GFP_WAIT in hand.
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure? The comments read:
> >> >
> >> > /*
> >> > * The radix tree path needs to be one longer than the maximum path
> >> > * since the "list" is null terminated.
> >> > */
> >> > struct radix_tree_path path[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH + 1], *pathp = path;
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Fengguang
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> lib/radix-tree.c | 2 +-
> >> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/lib/radix-tree.c b/lib/radix-tree.c
> >> >> index 23abbd9..72225a8 100644
> >> >> --- a/lib/radix-tree.c
> >> >> +++ b/lib/radix-tree.c
> >> >> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *radix_tree_node_cachep;
> >> >> */
> >> >> struct radix_tree_preload {
> >> >> int nr;
> >> >> - struct radix_tree_node *nodes[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH];
> >> >> + struct radix_tree_node *nodes[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH + 1];
> >> >> };
> >> >> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct radix_tree_preload, radix_tree_preloads) = { 0, };
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> 1.6.2.2
> >>
> >> here is test case.
> >> ---
> >> #include <linux/module.h>
> >> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> #include <linux/radix-tree.h>
> >>
> >> static void __exit exit_test(void)
> >> {
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int __init init_test(void)
> >> {
> >> struct radix_tree_root radix_tree;
> >> int foo;
> >>
> >> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&radix_tree, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> >> preempt_disable();
> >> radix_tree_insert(&radix_tree, (unsigned long)-2, &foo);
> >> preempt_enable();
> >> radix_tree_preload_end();
> >> radix_tree_delete(&radix_tree, (unsigned long)-2);
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> module_init(init_test)
> >> module_exit(exit_test)
> >> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >> -- end --
> >>
> >> I got following oops.
> >> ---
> >> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> >> /home/zhyan/linux-2.6/mm/slub.c:1697
> >> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 2791, name: insmod
> >> Pid: 2791, comm: insmod Not tainted 2.6.31-rc7 #1
> >> Call Trace:
> >> [<c042b26a>] __might_sleep+0x101/0x108
> >> [<c04b3976>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x39/0x141
> >> [<c05453c7>] ? radix_tree_node_alloc+0x4c/0x5d
> >> [<c05453c7>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x4c/0x5d
> >> [<c054549a>] radix_tree_insert+0xc2/0x174
> >> [<f90cd03f>] init_test+0x3f/0x89 [test]
> >> [<c0401141>] do_one_initcall+0x4f/0x11f
> >> [<f90cd000>] ? init_test+0x0/0x89 [test]
> >> [<c044e504>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x45/0x51
> >> [<c045d833>] sys_init_module+0xac/0x1bc
> >> [<c0403458>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x2d
> >> -- end --
> > This is weird, I cannot reproduce this message. Here is my .config.
> > I use SLAB but it also has the might_sleep_if(__GFP_WAIT) debug call.
> > Thanks,
> > Fengguang
>
> I realize it's my fault, I use GFP_KERNEL to initialize the radix tree.
> radix_tree_node_alloc does not use pre-loaded memory when the
> radix tree is initialized with GFP_KERNEL. Yesterday when I saw the
Ah yes!
> Oops, I suspect it's an radix_tree_preload bug. I told Zhu Yanhai
> my thought. Please forgive my rash act.
That's all right. So we can just do nothing? :)
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 12:10 [PATCH] Make radix_tree_preload alloc one more slot Zhu Yanhai
2009-08-27 12:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-27 16:46 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-08-28 1:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-28 2:33 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-08-28 3:31 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-08-28 5:58 ` Zhu Yanhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090828033149.GA24838@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
--cc=yanhai.zhu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yanzheng@21cn.com \
--cc=zhu.yanhai@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.