From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, jeff@garzik.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Convert libata pio task to slow-work
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:06:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828070641.GR12579@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9780EF.1030102@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 28 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>> Care to post it? I know you don't think it's perfect yet, but it would
> >>> make a lot more sense to throw effort into this rather than waste time
> >>> on partial solutions.
> >> I have this printed out code with full of red markings from proof
> >> reading and flush implementation is mostly broken. Please give me a
> >> couple of days. I'll post a rough unsplit version which at least
> >> compiles with the planned changes applied by the end of the week. :-)
> >
> > Alright, fair enough.
> >
> > One question - do the 'exposed' workqueues (the ones that drivers
> > allocate/create) sitting in front of the global cpu queue allow more
> > than one thread per cpu, or is that property retained for the global cpu
> > queue (where it is a necessity)?
>
> The exposed workqueues basically just play the gateway and don't have
> threads associated with it, well, at least not the normal ones. It
> may have single dedicated thread which usually isn't used but only
> gets summoned when a queue stall is detected (new thread needs to be
> created but blocks on allocation kind of situation). So, only the
> global cpu queue has normal workers and there are multiple per cpu and
> they're shared by all exported workqueues.
Thanks for the clarification, it answers the question on what level of
functionality is observed by the exported workqueues. Sounds good!
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 9:08 [PATCH 0/3] Convert libata pio task to slow-work Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] slow-work: add delayed_slow_work support Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 9:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] slow-work: add support for cancellation of slow work Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 9:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] libata: switch pio task from workqueue to slow-work Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 9:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] slow-work: add support for cancellation of slow work Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] slow-work: add support for cancellation of slow work (updated) Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 12:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] Convert libata pio task to slow-work Tejun Heo
2009-08-27 12:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-27 12:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-27 18:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-28 7:02 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-28 7:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-08-31 3:24 ` [very-early-draft-unsplit PATCH] workqueue: implement global cpu workqueue Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090828070641.GR12579@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.