From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:39:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908301039.05303@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908291517350.24777@p34.internal.lan>
On Samstag 29 August 2009 Justin Piszcz wrote:
> I was curious if you could show your smartctl -a output?
>
> smartctl -a /dev/sda
Here the important parts of it:
Device Model: WDC WD1500HLFS-01G6U0
Firmware Version: 04.04V01
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 190 185 021 Pre-fail Always - 1466
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 48
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 092 092 000 Old_age Always - 6282
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0
11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 48
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 13
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 48
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 112 102 000 Old_age Always - 31
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0
PNum Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6274 -
# 2 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6251 -
# 3 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6250 -
# 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6226 -
# 5 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6202 -
# 6 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6187 -
# 7 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6167 -
# 8 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6145 -
# 9 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6121 -
#10 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6097 -
#11 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6090 -
#12 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6024 -
#13 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3613 -
#14 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3589 -
#15 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 3567 -
#16 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3565 -
#17 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3541 -
#18 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3517 -
#19 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3493 -
#20 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3469 -
#21 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3445 -
> The SU issue most likely resulted in the xfs file going to 0 issue
> (i see the same thing on occasion during a PSU issue or crash/reboot)
Yes, and that's annoying. I've never had that for reiserfs, so I guess it's really XFS
to blame here. I like that filesystem, but such things really shouldn't happen.
> however I am curious to see if you see any of the issues here:
> http://forums.storagereview.net/index.php?showtopic=27303&hl=velociraptor
>
> Since you only use one drive and not a raid of the WD Velociraptors,
> you may not be affected, but I was curious, thanks.
In fact I use 3 VelociRaptor 150GB and 6 Raptors. 8 are in a single RAID-6
in a server running since about 3 years, and during this time 2 Raptors
died and were replaced by VelociRaptors. The one I use in my desktop
is a spare spart to use in case the server needs one. I just use it because
the speed is nice, and I see if it has failures.
Smartctl is running as a daemon here, so you can see the SMART self
tests. It's almost definitely not the drive.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-30 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-29 19:02 zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5 Michael Monnerie
2009-08-29 22:13 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-31 23:10 ` Peter Grandi
2009-09-01 7:18 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-09-01 10:32 ` Peter Grandi
2009-09-01 14:19 ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-09-01 22:52 ` Michael Monnerie
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908291517350.24777@p34.internal.lan>
2009-08-30 8:39 ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
2009-09-18 20:05 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908301039.05303@zmi.at \
--to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.