Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] ext2/3:

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

> Actually, there is something the file system can do to make journaling
> safe on degraded RAIDs: make the (checksummed) journal blocks equal to
> the RAID stripe size.  Or, equivalently, pad out to the RAID stripe
> size each commit.
> 
> This sometimes leads to awkward block sizes, but while writing
> to any *one* stripe on a degraded RAID-5 endangers the others, you
> can write to *all* of them with the usual semantics.

Well, that would work... but you'd also have to journal data, with the
same block size. Not exactly fast, but at least safe...

> That's one thing I really like about ZFS: its policy of "don't trust
> the disks."  If nothing else, simply telling you "your disks f*ed up,
> and I caught them doing it", instead of the usual mysterious corruption
> detectec three months later, is tremendoudly useful information.

The more I learn about storage, the more I like idea of zfs. Given the
subtle issues between filesystem and raid layer, integrating them just
makes sense.
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html