From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: Thought on tabled design; scaling tabled Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:02:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20090831200253.04cca01f@redhat.com> References: <4A88002D.5000605@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A88002D.5000605@garzik.org> Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Project Hail On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:48:45 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > single-master scalability > ------------------------- > Any db4 replication setup enables high availability through metadata > replication and fail-over, but it remains a single-master setup. [] Believe me, I know, but I thought the current goal is to have something to what users of Fedora can trust their data, and soon. Once we have our ext3 we may look at XFSes of the cloud world. > forward-to-master solution? > --------------------------- I want to leapfrog the forwarding phase and go multi-master without DB4 (and hopefuly fix startup times, and other issues you identified). The reason I'm poking Jeff Darcy and everyone else with questions about Walrus etc. is that I'm open to using anything that works. The Eucaliptus dude denied strongly (at the Red Hat Cloud Forum) that he's going to produce anything for the end users. I don't know if he was just being modest or it was for real. -- Pete