From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:38:07 +0200
Message-ID: <20090901053807.GJ12579@kernel.dk>
References: <20090901145949.58610c23.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090901153038.807f5586.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1752775AbZIAFiH@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090901153038.807f5586.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 01 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Alasdair,
> 
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:59:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > I have used the version of the block tree from next-20090831 for today.
> 
> Which means that I have had to use yesterday's version of the
> device-mapper tree as well (since it is based on the block tree).

Ah darn, sorry about that. I'll get that updated in about an hours time
and do a full compile.

-- 
Jens Axboe