All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Fernando Silveira <fsilveira@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I/O and pdflush
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:14:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901081458.GD1446@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6afc6d4a0908310733l6426e21fu11d826f6ffa6a2af@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:33:43PM +0800, Fernando Silveira wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:07, Wu Fengguang<fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:01:13PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:00:06PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >> > Hi Fernando,
> >> >
> >> > What's your SSD's IO parameters? Ie. output of this command:
> >> >
> >> >         grep -r . /sys/block/sda/queue/
> >> >
> >> > Please replace 'sda' with your SSD device name.
> >>
> >> Oh I guess it's sdc:
> >>
> >>          grep -r . /sys/block/sdc/queue/
> 
> Here is it:
> 
> # grep -r . /sys/block/sdc/queue/
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/nr_requests:128
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/read_ahead_kb:128
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb:128
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/max_sectors_kb:128
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler:noop anticipatory [deadline] cfq
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/hw_sector_size:512
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/rotational:0
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/nomerges:0
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/rq_affinity:0
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/iostats:1
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/read_expire:500
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/write_expire:5000
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/writes_starved:2
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/front_merges:1
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/fifo_batch:16
> #
> 
> These are probably default settings.
> 
> > BTW, would you run "iostat -x 1 5" (which will run 5 seconds) when
> > doing I/O in ideal throughput, and when in 25MB/s thoughput state?
> 
> Both files are attached (25mbps = 25MB/s, 80mbps = 80MB/s).

The iostat reported IO size is 64kb, which is half of max_sectors_kb=128.
It is strange why the optimal 128kb IO size is not reached in both cases:

        Device:         rrqm/s   wrqm/s     r/s     w/s    rsec/s   wsec/s  avgrq-sz avgqu-sz   await  svctm  %util
case 1: sdc               0.00 69088.00     0.00  552.00     0.00 70656.00    128.00   142.75  386.39   1.81 100.10
case 2: sdc               0.00 153504.00    0.00 1200.00     0.00 153600.00   128.00   138.35  115.76   0.83 100.10

Fernando, could you try increasing these deadline parameters by 10
times?

        echo 160   > /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/fifo_batch
        echo 50000 > /sys/block/sdc/queue/iosched/write_expire

And try cfq iosched if that still fails? The iostat outputs would be
enough during the tests.

Thanks,
Fengguang

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-01  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-11 17:27 I/O and pdflush Fernando Silveira
2009-07-12  8:04 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-28 21:48   ` Fernando Silveira
2009-08-29 10:12     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-29 10:21       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-31 13:24         ` Fernando Silveira
2009-08-31 14:00           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-31 14:01             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-31 14:07               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-31 14:33                 ` Fernando Silveira
2009-09-01  8:14                   ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <6afc6d4a0909010710l2cf77fbbmb1ab192ed12a7efc@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-02  3:05                       ` Wu Fengguang
     [not found]                         ` <6afc6d4a0909020429l2bfecee9xd00527fcaa323751@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                           ` <20090902125057.GA7982@localhost>
     [not found]                             ` <6afc6d4a0909031346qda0b17coe4c60250fcac827f@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-04  2:21                               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-04  2:34                                 ` Wu Fengguang
     [not found] <cWOyL-3Ys-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-08-31 21:57 ` Daniel J Blueman
2009-09-01 14:33   ` Fernando Silveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090901081458.GD1446@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=fsilveira@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.