From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux client mount fails with Gluster NFSv3 server
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:43:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901164334.GL22846@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251807998.18608.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:26:37AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 12:09 +0530, Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
> > I am able to view the packets just fine using wireshark Version 1.0.6.
> > It is possible that the default options for you for TCP and RPC are
> > not same as the ones below.
> > Could you please try viewing the dump with the following options set
> > in the wireshark Protocol preferences pane.
> >
> > Press <Ctrl> + <Shift> + p to bring up the protocol preferences
> > window.
> >
> > First, expand the "Protocol" section header in the window that pops
> > up. Then look for "TCP" section. In the TCP section, please check the
> > following option:
> >
> > "Allow subdissector to reassemble TCP streams"
> >
> > Then, search for the "RPC" section under "Protocols". For RPC, please
> > check the following option:
> >
> > "Reassemble RPC over TCP message spanning multiple TCP segments"
> >
> > This should make the RPC records visible properly.
>
> I always run with those options enabled, and they were able to
> reconstruct most of the RPC records correctly, but not the reply to the
> FSINFO call.
Same here--both options set, and I don't normally have this problem.
The segments look OK, though (the sequence numbers are what you'd
expect, anyway)--if the xdr was screwed up you'd think wireshark would
still attempt to parse it. I'm using 1.0.7 (from 1.0.7-1ubuntu1), but
too lazy to try to debug wireshark....
--b.
> Furthermore, when I looked at the binary contents, it seemed to me that
> the post-op attributes contained some fishy information, such as
> nlink==0. That alone would cause the NFS client to give up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 14:07 Linux client mount fails with Gluster NFSv3 server Shehjar Tikoo
[not found] ` <4A9BD90B.4090804-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 17:12 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251738771.5144.21.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-01 6:39 ` Shehjar Tikoo
[not found] ` <4A9CC186.10504-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-01 12:26 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251807998.18608.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-01 13:13 ` Shehjar Tikoo
2009-09-01 16:43 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-08-31 19:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090901164334.GL22846@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shehjart-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.