From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KEYS: Extend TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #5] Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:05:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20090902080542.GA29221@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090902072053.3578.69125.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090902072129.3578.81364.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090902072129.3578.81364.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells Cc: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:21:29AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c > index f6bc5d4..6759f45 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c > @@ -707,4 +707,9 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags, int syscall) > { > if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING) > do_signal(¤t->blocked, regs, syscall); > + > + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) { This still has the same error - is this just a repost of the previous patch? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: