From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:21:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903132212.224601306@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090903132145.482814810@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3932 bytes --]
Do the placement thing using SD flags
XXX: consider degenerate bits
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
kernel/sched.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -808,18 +808,19 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
#define SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ SCHED_LOAD_SCALE
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#define SD_LOAD_BALANCE 1 /* Do load balancing on this domain. */
-#define SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE 2 /* Balance when about to become idle */
-#define SD_BALANCE_EXEC 4 /* Balance on exec */
-#define SD_BALANCE_FORK 8 /* Balance on fork, clone */
-#define SD_WAKE_IDLE 16 /* Wake to idle CPU on task wakeup */
-#define SD_WAKE_AFFINE 32 /* Wake task to waking CPU */
-#define SD_WAKE_BALANCE 64 /* Perform balancing at task wakeup */
-#define SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER 128 /* Domain members share cpu power */
-#define SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE 256 /* Balance for power savings */
-#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 512 /* Domain members share cpu pkg resources */
-#define SD_SERIALIZE 1024 /* Only a single load balancing instance */
-#define SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR 2048 /* Gain latency sacrificing cache hit */
+#define SD_LOAD_BALANCE 0x0001 /* Do load balancing on this domain. */
+#define SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE 0x0002 /* Balance when about to become idle */
+#define SD_BALANCE_EXEC 0x0004 /* Balance on exec */
+#define SD_BALANCE_FORK 0x0008 /* Balance on fork, clone */
+#define SD_WAKE_IDLE 0x0010 /* Wake to idle CPU on task wakeup */
+#define SD_WAKE_AFFINE 0x0020 /* Wake task to waking CPU */
+#define SD_WAKE_BALANCE 0x0040 /* Perform balancing at task wakeup */
+#define SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER 0x0080 /* Domain members share cpu power */
+#define SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE 0x0100 /* Balance for power savings */
+#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0200 /* Domain members share cpu pkg resources */
+#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0400 /* Only a single load balancing instance */
+#define SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR 0x0800 /* Gain latency sacrificing cache hit */
+#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x1000 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */
enum powersavings_balance_level {
POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_NONE = 0, /* No power saving load balance */
@@ -839,7 +840,7 @@ static inline int sd_balance_for_mc_powe
if (sched_smt_power_savings)
return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
- return 0;
+ return SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
}
static inline int sd_balance_for_package_power(void)
@@ -847,7 +848,7 @@ static inline int sd_balance_for_package
if (sched_mc_power_savings | sched_smt_power_savings)
return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
- return 0;
+ return SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
}
/*
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3803,9 +3803,13 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
const struct cpumask *cpus, int *balance,
struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
{
+ struct sched_domain *child = sd->child;
struct sched_group *group = sd->groups;
struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
- int load_idx;
+ int load_idx, prefer_sibling = 0;
+
+ if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
+ prefer_sibling = 1;
init_sd_power_savings_stats(sd, sds, idle);
load_idx = get_sd_load_idx(sd, idle);
@@ -3825,6 +3829,14 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
sds->total_load += sgs.group_load;
sds->total_pwr += group->__cpu_power;
+ /*
+ * In case the child domain prefers tasks go to siblings
+ * first, lower the group capacity to one so that we'll try
+ * and move all the excess tasks away.
+ */
+ if (prefer_sibling)
+ sgs.group_capacity = 1;
+
if (local_group) {
sds->this_load = sgs.avg_load;
sds->this = group;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 13:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] load-balancing and cpu_power -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:19 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:34 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 14:22 ` Dave Jones
2009-09-04 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 17:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched: provide arch_scale_freq_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903132212.224601306@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.