From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@att.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: binfmt_flat.c && bprm->cred (Was: [PATCH 0/1] exec: do not sleep in TASK_TRACED under ->cred_guard_mutex)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:58:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903165850.GC5485@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090903162939.GA24528@redhat.com>
[Oleg Nesterov - Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:29:39PM +0200]
| On 09/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
| >
| > load_flat_shared_library() does something strange (but hopefully this
| > patch doesn't break it). I do not understand why does it create the
| > new bprm. Afaics, it could reuse bprm pointer which comes as an argument
| > of ->load_binary(), all we need is to temporary change/restore bprm->file
| > for load_flat_file().
|
| IOW, afaics the patch below makes sense. Imho it is a bit ugly binfmt_flat.c
| plays with prepare_exec_creds().
|
| But again, I don't understand this code, and I didn't even try to compile
| this patch.
|
| Oleg.
|
...
| -static int load_flat_shared_library(int id, struct lib_info *libs)
| +static int load_flat_shared_library(struct linux_binprm *bprm, int id,
| + struct lib_info *libs)
| {
...
| + sprintf(buf, "/lib/lib%d.so", id);
Hi Oleg, perhaps it is a good moment to switch sprintf to snprintf
as well? buf is only 16 bytes long so we have 4 byte room for number.
Not sure if it's possible to have 10000 relocs though :) Just a thought.
Most probably I miss something.
-- Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 16:05 [PATCH 0/1] exec: do not sleep in TASK_TRACED under ->cred_guard_mutex Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-03 16:29 ` binfmt_flat.c && bprm->cred (Was: [PATCH 0/1] exec: do not sleep in TASK_TRACED under ->cred_guard_mutex) Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-03 16:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-09-03 17:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-03 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-04 8:47 ` [PATCH 0/1] exec: do not sleep in TASK_TRACED under ->cred_guard_mutex David Howells
2009-09-04 9:22 ` Roland McGrath
2009-09-04 9:34 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903165850.GC5485@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tom.horsley@att.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.