From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
"linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:56:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904145638.GA23091@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909041639.46289.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:39:46PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Quite frankly, I'm not sure of that. It really depends on how PME# is routed
> in given system. The spec permits routing it directly to the chipset as well
> as routing it through bridges and I don't know if we can assume that the
> first upstream device capable of generating wake-up events will handle it.
The GPE block is going to be in the chipset, so unless the vendors have
explicitly hooked up a link between the PME line from a bridge and the
EC, we're presumably always going to get it from the chipset if at all.
> That said, I think we can try returning from
> acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable() as soon as
> acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() returns 0 for current device. On the test systems
> I have it won't make any difference, because the GPE is shared among the
> root bridge and the first upstream bridge of the device in question.
Yes, it's presumably the case that the PME event in the bridge is just
tied to the root bridge in the chipset. Do we know what chipset this
hardware is? For Intel, at least, GPE behaviour is defined in the
chipset docs.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-29 22:41 [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Allow PCI root bridges to wake up the system Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 19:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 19:41 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 21:24 ` [RFC][PATCH update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 13:25 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-01 13:25 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-01 19:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 22:41 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable upstream Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PCI PM: Simplify PCI wake-up code Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Rework some debug messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] PCI PM: Introduce device flag wakeup_prepared Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 2:13 ` ykzhao
2009-09-04 14:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 14:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 14:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 14:56 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2009-09-04 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 2:13 ` ykzhao
2009-09-04 22:03 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4 replacement] ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 5] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:11 ` [PATCH 0/5 update] PCI / ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable upstream Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI PM: Simplify PCI wake-up code Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-09 21:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-09 21:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-08 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI / ACPI PM: Rework some debug messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI PM: Introduce device flag wakeup_prepared Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI / ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 19:03 ` [RFC][PATCH update] ACPI / PM: Allow PCI root bridges to wake up the system Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090904145638.GA23091@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.