From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
a.zummo@towertech.it
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: Document the sysfs interface
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:23:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904162311.a2a3f19b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090904165206.GF1576@sirena.org.uk>
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:52:06 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:39:18PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:35:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Wouldn't this be better placed under Documentation/ABI?
>
> > Unsure. I'd assumed it made more sense in the existing docs.
>
> My understanding is that the sysfs ABI (and ABIs in general, I guess)
> should be moving towards the more formal style of Documentation/ABI to
> help manage userspace expectations - the separation of the documentation
> applies to most other things in there as well.
Yes, I think you're right.
But I'm not going to pass on a documentation patch just because it's in
the wrong place ;)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-04 16:26 [PATCH 1/2] rtc: Document the sysfs interface Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: Add boot_timesource sysfs attribute Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 16:25 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2009-09-04 16:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 16:38 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2009-09-04 16:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 16:52 ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-09-04 16:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 17:03 ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-09-04 17:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-05 21:11 ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-09-06 1:34 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-14 22:59 ` Karel Zak
2009-09-04 16:26 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 1/2] rtc: Document the sysfs interface Alessandro Zummo
2009-09-04 16:35 ` Mark Brown
2009-09-04 16:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 16:52 ` [rtc-linux] " Mark Brown
2009-09-04 23:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090904162311.a2a3f19b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.