All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Lala <clala@riverbed.com>
To: tj@kernel.org
Cc: clala@riverbed.com, rbecker@riverbed.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Disk failure behavior
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:23:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904172316.GA6076@clala-laptop> (raw)

Hi,

I am using a back-port of libata from ~ 2.6.20 on a 2.6.9
Red Hat kernel. I have SATA disks (using AHCI) in the 
system which are hot-pluggable. The problem I am facing
is that, certain disk failures bring the system into a
weird state. The system tries to reset the disk but fails.
Finally it prints a message "reset failed, giving up."

At this point the port is left in a frozen state and
the interrupts from the port are masked. If now, this disk is
pulled out and a healthy disk is inserted, the new disk's
insertion does not raise any event/notification/interrupt.
In fact, the only way at this point to get the disk to work is
to reboot.

Below is a snippet of the code, I am referring to, from v2.6.20.
File - drivers/ata/libata-eh.c & function-name -  ata_eh_recover
 
	/* reset */
	if (ehc->i.action & ATA_EH_RESET_MASK) {
		ata_eh_freeze_port(ap);

		rc = ata_eh_reset(ap, ata_port_nr_vacant(ap), prereset,
				  softreset, hardreset, postreset);
		if (rc) {
			ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_ERR,
					"reset failed, giving up\n");
			goto out; 
		}    

		ata_eh_thaw_port(ap);
	} 

A possible work-around is to thaw the port before going to "out".
That would enable the interrupts again before going to "out".
I understand that would enable future interrupts from the old disk as well,
but I am willing to live with that, if it helps to detect the new device.

	/* reset */
	if (ehc->i.action & ATA_EH_RESET_MASK) {
		ata_eh_freeze_port(ap);

		rc = ata_eh_reset(ap, ata_port_nr_vacant(ap), prereset,
				  softreset, hardreset, postreset);
		if (rc) {
			ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_ERR,
					"reset failed, giving up\n");
+			ata_eh_thaw_port(ap);
			goto out; 
		}    

		ata_eh_thaw_port(ap);
	} 

I have tested this successfully. But I would like to ask you if this would
possibly "break" some other functionality ? I am new to the kernel ata stuff
and want to be sure before I use this.

Thanks,
Chaitanya


             reply	other threads:[~2009-09-04 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-04 17:23 Chaitanya Lala [this message]
2009-09-05  0:31 ` Disk failure behavior Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090904172316.GA6076@clala-laptop \
    --to=clala@riverbed.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rbecker@riverbed.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.