All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@shaw.ca>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Western Digital RE3: Raid Failure
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:53:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909042153.23094.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0909031221160.7746@sbhezbfg.of5.nffheflf.cev>

On Thu September 3 2009, you wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:14:45AM +0200, MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets] 
wrote:
> >> This is the output of smartctl -a /dev/sdc:
> >> http://nopaste.com/p/aXwmnSEphb
> >
> >  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   197   197   140    Pre-fail  Always  
> >     -       24 [...]
> > 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   197   197   000    Old_age   Always 
> >      -       3
> >
> > IMHO it's time to replace the drive. I think it also shows that TLER is
> > working just as expected: timing out when the recovery would have taken
> > too long.
>
> The drive has only been spinning for 1008 hours, or about 42 days. It's
> probably still under warranty, but I'd be surprised if WD (or any other
> vendor) will accept an RMA since it will probably pass all its diagnostic
> tests.

I just returned a Seagate drive that passed all tests. But its reallocated 
sector count was over 1500 (and climbing 10 or more per hour). The support 
tech didn't have a problem with authorizing the RMA. So if the problem gets 
bad enough, they SHOULD take the drive back, or at least Seagate will.

>
> Note that those SMART attributes are nothing particularly scary and this is
> backed up by both attributes being significantly higher than their
> respective thresholds; modern drives have thousands of spare sectors, so a
> few going bad is to be expected.
>
> > Gabor
>
> Best Regards,
> Alex
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@shaw.ca

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-05  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-27  9:43 Western Digital RE3: Raid Failure MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets]
2009-08-27 13:38 ` Michal Soltys
2009-08-27 14:44   ` Drew
2009-08-31 10:11   ` MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets]
2009-08-31 18:44     ` Richard Scobie
2009-08-31 20:58 ` Zdenek Kaspar
2009-09-03  9:14   ` MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets]
2009-09-03 11:06     ` Gabor Gombas
2009-09-03 11:24       ` Alex Butcher
2009-09-05  3:53         ` Thomas Fjellstrom [this message]
2009-09-05 12:15           ` Alex Butcher
2009-09-05 12:22             ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-03 12:28     ` Zdenek Kaspar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909042153.23094.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca \
    --to=tfjellstrom@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.