From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] tracing/ring-buffer: fixes for latency tracer [2.6.32] Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 13:22:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20090907112225.GC6393@nowhere> References: <20090904235527.520961911@goodmis.org> <20090905150658.GA13387@ghostprotocols.net> <4de7f8a60909070320j692d746drb06bd635ca7f7c55@mail.gmail.com> <20090907102838.GA6393@nowhere> <20090907104155.GD28804@bolzano.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ulrich Lukas , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Clark Williams , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra To: Jan Blunck Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090907104155.GD28804@bolzano.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:41:55PM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Ah, Ulrich Lukas also reported me such warnings. I would like to > > track the reason of these messages (the hrtimer hanging detection > > seems to warn too early). > > > > Could you please send me your config, I hope I could reproduce it. > > > > I only see that on one of my systems, a 32 core Opteron and not on my 8 > core. So it seems that size does matter ... Ah then I have few chances to reproduce it with my boxes :-) I'll try anyway, thanks!