All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Filesystem Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite() further
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:58:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090908145832.GE26346@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090908144012.GB5579@shareable.org>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:40:12PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > This function is only called for path components that are already known
> > to be directories (they have a '->lookup' method).  So don't bother
> > doing that whole S_ISDIR() testing,
> 
> A few years ago you briefly discussed diddling the VFS to accept
> objects which are both files and directories.  That is, have
> ->lookup() and also can be read as regular files.
> 
> I don't know if your thinking has changed, and I don't particularly
> care, only thought I'd remind in case it's something you'd like to
> support at some point.

If it's being used as a component of a pathname, we're _using_ it as a
directory, so it won't matter for this case.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-08 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-07 21:01 [PATCH 0/8] VFS name lookup permission checking cleanup Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] Do not call 'ima_path_check()' for each path component Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:02   ` [PATCH 2/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite() logic Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:03     ` [PATCH 3/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite() further Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:03       ` [PATCH 4/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite(), part 3 Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:04         ` [PATCH 5/8] Make 'check_acl()' a first-class filesystem op Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:04           ` [PATCH 6/8] shmfs: use 'check_acl' instead of 'permission' Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:05             ` [PATCH 7/8] ext[234]: move over to 'check_acl' permission model Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 21:05               ` [PATCH 8/8] jffs2/jfs/xfs: switch over to 'check_acl' rather than 'permission()' Linus Torvalds
2009-09-08 18:34                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-09 17:09                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 22:23             ` [PATCH 6/8] shmfs: use 'check_acl' instead of 'permission' James Morris
2009-09-08  0:03               ` James Morris
2009-09-08 18:05             ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-07 22:20           ` [PATCH 5/8] Make 'check_acl()' a first-class filesystem op James Morris
2009-09-07 22:18         ` [PATCH 4/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite(), part 3 James Morris
2009-09-07 22:15       ` [PATCH 3/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite() further James Morris
2009-09-08 14:40       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-08 14:58         ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-09-08 15:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-07 22:12     ` [PATCH 2/8] Simplify exec_permission_lite() logic James Morris
2009-09-08  1:50   ` [PATCH 1/8] Do not call 'ima_path_check()' for each path component Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-08 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] VFS name lookup permission checking cleanup Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-08 17:52 ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090908145832.GE26346@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.