From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [long] Another BFS versus CFS shakedown
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:44:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909090244.14339.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909090142.41738.elendil@planet.nl>
On Wednesday 09 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> BFS general impression
> ----------------------
> I've used BFS for over a day yesterday and today, and in general I'm
> very impressed. During normal use (coding and testing a shell script
> that's CPU/memory heavy + normal mail/news/browser + amarok) I've not
> seen any strange issues. My notebook even suspended and resumed (StR)
> without any problems.
>
> With CFS I regularly have short freezes of the mouse cursor or when
> typing. I think that it's related to KDE's news reader knode updating
> from my local news server. With CFS I also saw such freezes a few
> times, but they _seemed_ less frequent and less severe. No hard data
> though.
The 2nd CFS should have been BFS here. Sorry.
> But this evening, while I was preparing and running the tests, I've had
> 4 freezes of the desktop. The first two times it was only a partial
> freeze: taskbar was frozen, but I could still switch apps and use the
> graphical console; the last two times it was a full freeze of the
> display and keyboard (incl. e.g. numlock), but in the background
> everything continued to run normally and I could log in over SSH
> without any problem. On reboot some file systems did fail to unmount
> though.
>
> Normally my desktop and X.Org are 100% reliable.
Cheers,
FJP
P.S. I've received a very positive and friendly private reply from Con.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 23:42 [long] Another BFS versus CFS shakedown Frans Pop
2009-09-09 0:01 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-09-09 0:44 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2009-09-11 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-11 7:04 ` Frans Pop
2009-09-11 7:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-11 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-11 7:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909090244.14339.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.