From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:10:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909141038.GB9418@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <298239.22413.qm@web56105.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:19:20AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules on F12.
> Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and installed
> on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1.
> Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong's 'rc7.git4' kernel for F12.
I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that 2.6.31-rc8
boots without the stack-trace failure? Can you attach the dmesg please
and also 'lspci -vvv' output?
>
> Boris.
>
> --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable, stacktrace with >4096M of dom0_mem
> To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 3:45 PM
>
> Dmesg log for rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 on F12 rawhide attached.
I took a look at the dmesg and it looks fine. I did not see a stack trace in it?
Maybe I was looking at the wrong one. This is the identifying timestamp at the beginning:
Linux version 2.6.31-rc8 (root@ServerXen35) (gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC) ) #3 SMP Tue Sep 8 04:24:43 EDT 2009
is that the right dmesg?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 7:19 Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12 Boris Derzhavets
2009-09-09 14:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-09 14:55 Boris Derzhavets
2009-09-09 19:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-09-09 20:02 ` Boris Derzhavets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909141038.GB9418@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bderzhavets@yahoo.com \
--cc=fedora-xen@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.