From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12
	(rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on
	F12
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:10:38 -0400
Message-ID: <20090909141038.GB9418@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <298239.22413.qm@web56105.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <298239.22413.qm@web56105.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:19:20AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules =
on F12.
> Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and=
 installed
> on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1.=20
> Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong's 'rc7.git4'=A0 kernel for F12=
.

I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that 2.6.31-r=
c8
boots without the stack-trace failure? Can you attach the dmesg please
and also 'lspci -vvv' output?

>=20
> Boris.
>=20
> --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:
>=20
> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xe=
n 3.5 unstable, stacktrace with >4096M of dom0_mem
> To: "Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen" <pasik@iki.fi>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konr=
ad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.=
com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 3:45 PM
>=20
> Dmesg log for rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 on F12 rawhide attached.

I took a look at the dmesg and it looks fine. I did not see a stack trace=
 in it?

Maybe I was looking at the wrong one. This is the identifying timestamp a=
t the beginning:
Linux version 2.6.31-rc8 (root@ServerXen35) (gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (=
Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC) ) #3 SMP Tue Sep 8 04:24:43 EDT 2009

is that the right dmesg?