From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, mel@csn.ul.ie,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, rientjes@google.com,
agl@us.ibm.com, apw@canonical.com, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:15:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910161525.dce065b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090909163152.12963.80784.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:31:52 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> This patch derives a "nodes_allowed" node mask from the numa
> mempolicy of the task modifying the number of persistent huge
> pages to control the allocation, freeing and adjusting of surplus
> huge pages.
>
> ...
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc7-mmotm-090827-1651/mm/mempolicy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc7-mmotm-090827-1651.orig/mm/mempolicy.c 2009-09-09 11:57:26.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc7-mmotm-090827-1651/mm/mempolicy.c 2009-09-09 11:57:36.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1564,6 +1564,57 @@ struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm
> }
> return zl;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * alloc_nodemask_of_mempolicy
> + *
> + * Returns a [pointer to a] nodelist based on the current task's mempolicy.
> + *
> + * If the task's mempolicy is "default" [NULL], return NULL for default
> + * behavior. Otherwise, extract the policy nodemask for 'bind'
> + * or 'interleave' policy or construct a nodemask for 'preferred' or
> + * 'local' policy and return a pointer to a kmalloc()ed nodemask_t.
> + *
> + * N.B., it is the caller's responsibility to free a returned nodemask.
> + */
> +nodemask_t *alloc_nodemask_of_mempolicy(void)
> +{
> + nodemask_t *nodes_allowed = NULL;
> + struct mempolicy *mempolicy;
> + int nid;
> +
> + if (!current->mempolicy)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + mpol_get(current->mempolicy);
> + nodes_allowed = kmalloc(sizeof(*nodes_allowed), GFP_KERNEL);
Ho hum. I guess a caller which didn't permit GFP_KERNEL would be
pretty lame.
> + if (!nodes_allowed)
> + return NULL; /* silently default */
Missed an mpol_put().
> + nodes_clear(*nodes_allowed);
> + mempolicy = current->mempolicy;
> + switch (mempolicy->mode) {
> + case MPOL_PREFERRED:
> + if (mempolicy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
> + nid = numa_node_id();
> + else
> + nid = mempolicy->v.preferred_node;
> + node_set(nid, *nodes_allowed);
> + break;
> +
> + case MPOL_BIND:
> + /* Fall through */
> + case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> + *nodes_allowed = mempolicy->v.nodes;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + }
> +
> + mpol_put(current->mempolicy);
> + return nodes_allowed;
> +}
Do we actually need the mpol_get()/put here? Can some other process
really some in and trash a process's current->mempolicy when that
process isn't looking?
If so, why the heck isn't the code racy?
static inline void mpol_get(struct mempolicy *pol)
{
if (pol)
atomic_inc(&pol->refcnt);
}
If it's possible for some other task to trash current->mempolicy then
that trashing can happen between the `if' and the `atomic_inc', so
we're screwed.
So either we need some locking here or the mpol_get() isn't needed on
current's mempolicy or the mpol_get() has some secret side-effect?
Fixlets:
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-derive-huge-pages-nodes-allowed-from-task-mempolicy-fix
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(
nodes_allowed = alloc_nodemask_of_mempolicy();
if (!nodes_allowed) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s unable to allocate nodes allowed mask "
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: unable to allocate nodes allowed mask "
"for huge page allocation. Falling back to default.\n",
current->comm);
nodes_allowed = &node_online_map;
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~hugetlb-derive-huge-pages-nodes-allowed-from-task-mempolicy-fix
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ nodemask_t *alloc_nodemask_of_mempolicy(
mpol_get(current->mempolicy);
nodes_allowed = kmalloc(sizeof(*nodes_allowed), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nodes_allowed)
- return NULL; /* silently default */
+ goto out; /* silently default */
nodes_clear(*nodes_allowed);
mempolicy = current->mempolicy;
@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ nodemask_t *alloc_nodemask_of_mempolicy(
default:
BUG();
}
-
+out:
mpol_put(current->mempolicy);
return nodes_allowed;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 16:31 [PATCH 0/6] hugetlb: V6 constrain allocation/free based on task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: introduce alloc_nodemask_of_node Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-10 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-10 23:17 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-10 23:17 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-10 23:43 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-11 13:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-11 13:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-11 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-11 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-11 13:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 12:32 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-10 12:32 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-10 14:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 14:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 19:50 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-10 19:58 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-11 13:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-11 13:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for mempolicy based management Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] hugetlb: use only nodes with memory for huge pages Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-11 13:54 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: handle memory hot-plug events Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910161525.dce065b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.