All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 21/35] libfc: combine name server registration response handlers
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:58:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090911235847.27223.88067.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911235655.27223.69728.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

From: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>

They all do the same thing, so combine them into a single function.

Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c |  205 ++++++-----------------------------------
 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
index 76197d7..5e7b560 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
@@ -985,9 +985,9 @@ static void fc_lport_error(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
 }
 
 /**
- * fc_lport_rft_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Fibre
- *			    Channel Types by ID (RFT_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RFT_ID exchange
+ * fc_lport_ns_resp() - Handle response to a name server
+ * 			registration exchange
+ * @sp: current sequence in exchange
  * @fp: response frame
  * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
  *
@@ -995,130 +995,23 @@ static void fc_lport_error(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
  * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
  * and then unlock the lport.
  */
-static void fc_lport_rft_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				 void *lp_arg)
+static void fc_lport_ns_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
+			     void *lp_arg)
 {
 	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
 	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
 	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
 
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a ns %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
 
 	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
 
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
-		if (IS_ERR(fp))
-			goto err;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
-	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-
-	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
-	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_scr(lport);
-	else
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-out:
-	fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
-	mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
- * fc_lport_rspn_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Symbolic Port Name
- *			     by ID (RSPN_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RSPN_ID exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rspn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				  void *lp_arg)
-{
-	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
-	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
-	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSPN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
-	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RSPN_ID) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSPN_ID response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
-		if (IS_ERR(fp))
-			goto err;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
-	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
-	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(lport);
-	else
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
-out:
-	fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
-	mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-/**
- * fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp() - Handle response to Register Symbolic Node Name
- *			     by Node Name (RSNN_NN) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RSNN_NN exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				  void *lp_arg)
-{
-	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
-	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
-	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSNN_NN %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
-	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RSNN_NN) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSNN_NN response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
+	if (lport->state < LPORT_ST_RNN_ID || lport->state > LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
+		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a name server response, "
+				    "but in state %s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
 		if (IS_ERR(fp))
 			goto err;
 		goto out;
@@ -1131,68 +1024,30 @@ static void fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
 
 	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
 	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
-	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(lport);
-	else
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
-out:
-	fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
-	mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
 
-/**
- * fc_lport_rnn_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Node
- *			    Name by ID (RNN_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RNN_ID exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rnn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				 void *lp_arg)
-{
-	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
-	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
-	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RNN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
-	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RNN_ID) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RNN_ID response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
-		if (IS_ERR(fp))
-			goto err;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
-	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
 	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
 	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
 	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
 	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_rft_id(lport);
+		switch (lport->state) {
+		case LPORT_ST_RNN_ID:
+			fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(lport);
+			break;
+		case LPORT_ST_RSNN_NN:
+			fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(lport);
+			break;
+		case LPORT_ST_RSPN_ID:
+			fc_lport_enter_rft_id(lport);
+			break;
+		case LPORT_ST_RFT_ID:
+			fc_lport_enter_scr(lport);
+			break;
+		default:
+			/* should have already been caught by state checks */
+			break;
+		}
 	else
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
 out:
 	fc_frame_free(fp);
 err:
@@ -1311,7 +1166,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rft_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RFT_ID,
-				  fc_lport_rft_id_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }
@@ -1342,7 +1197,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RSPN_ID,
-				  fc_lport_rspn_id_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }
@@ -1373,7 +1228,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RSNN_NN,
-				  fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }
@@ -1402,7 +1257,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rnn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RNN_ID,
-				  fc_lport_rnn_id_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-11 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-11 23:56 [PATCH 00/35] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for 2.6.32 Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 01/35] libfc: fix typo in retry check on received PRLI Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 02/35] fcoe: Increase FCOE_MAX_LUN to 0xFFFF (65535) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 03/35] libfc: Move non-common routines and prototypes out of libfc.h Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 04/35] libfc: Remove fc_fcp_complete Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 05/35] libfc: Add libfc/fc_libfc.[ch] for libfc internal routines Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 06/35] libfc: Move libfc_init and libfc_exit to fc_libfc.c Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 07/35] libfc: fix ddp in fc_fcp for 0 xid Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 08/35] fcoe: remove redundant checking of netdev->netdev_ops Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 09/35] libfc, fcoe: fixes for highmem skb linearize panics Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 10/35] libfc: changes to libfc_host_alloc to consolidate initialization with allocation Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 11/35] libfc: add some generic NPIV support routines to libfc Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 12/35] libfc: vport link handling and fc_vport state managment Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 13/35] libfc, libfcoe: FDISC ELS for NPIV Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 14/35] libfcoe, fcoe: libfcoe NPIV support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 15/35] fcoe: add a separate scsi transport template for NPIV vports Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 16/35] fcoe: NPIV vport create/destroy Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 17/35] libfc: RPN_ID is obsolete and unnecessary Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 18/35] libfc: RNN_ID may be required before RSNN_NN with some switches Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 19/35] libfc: Register Symbolic Node Name (RSNN_NN) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 20/35] libfc: Register Symbolic Port Name (RSPN_ID) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 22/35] libfc: combine name server registration request functions Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 23/35] fcoe: vport symbolic name support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 24/35] libfc: Export FC headers Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 25/35] libfc: Add routine to copy data from a buffer to a SG list Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 26/35] libfc, fcoe: Add FC passthrough support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 27/35] libfc, fcoe: Don't EXPORT_SYMBOLS unnecessarily Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 28/35] libfc: Remove unused fc_lport pointer from fc_fcp_pkt_abort Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 29/35] libfc: Formatting cleanups across libfc Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 30/35] libfcoe: formatting and comment cleanups Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 31/35] fcoe: Formatting cleanups and commenting Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 32/35] libfc: Fix wrong scsi return status under FC_DATA_UNDRUN Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 33/35] fcoe, libfc: use single frame allocation API Robert Love
2009-09-12  0:00 ` [PATCH 34/35] libfc: reduce can_queue for all FCP frame allocation failures Robert Love
2009-09-12  0:00 ` [PATCH 35/35] libfc: adds can_queue ramp up Robert Love
2009-09-14 17:18   ` Mike Christie
2009-09-14 23:23     ` Vasu Dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090911235847.27223.88067.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.