From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"avi@qumranet.com" <avi@qumranet.com>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] devmem: introduce size_inside_page()
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:41:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090912144157.GB6511@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911165543.d2485e0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 07:55:43AM +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:23:35 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Introduce size_inside_page() to replace duplicate /dev/mem code.
> >
> > Also apply it to /dev/kmem, whose alignment logic was buggy.
> >
> >
> > CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> > CC: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > CC: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > CC: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/mem.c | 60 +++++++++++++------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- linux.orig/drivers/char/mem.c
> > +++ linux/drivers/char/mem.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,19 @@
> > # include <linux/efi.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > +static inline unsigned long size_inside_page(unsigned long start,
> > + unsigned long size)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long sz;
> > +
> > + if (-start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
> > + sz = -start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>
> What on earth is this doing? Negating an unsigned number?
>
> Can we get rid of these party tricks and use something more
> conventional here? In a separate patch I guess.
OK. See the followed patches.
> > + else
> > + sz = PAGE_SIZE;
> > +
> > + return min_t(unsigned long, sz, size);
>
> Can use min() here.
Done.
> > +}
>
> Please have a think about the types. Should we be using unsigned long,
> or size_t? Which makes more sense? Which maps better onto reality?
>
> I suspect that the min_t which you inherited was added somewhere
> because someone didn't get the types right: int-vs-size_t or something.
> If we actually get the types right, this sort of thing goes away.
I tend to just use unsigned long because even though the value itself
is small, it will be elevated to unsigned long in majority use cases.
Does that make sense?
>
> > @@ -462,10 +451,8 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *fi
> > if (!kbuf)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > while (count > 0) {
> > - int len = count;
> > + int len = size_inside_page(p, count);
>
> int?
Err, changed it to unsigned long sz.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-12 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 2:23 [PATCH 0/3] /dev/mem cleanups and bug fix Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] devmem: remove redundant test on len Wu Fengguang
2009-09-12 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-12 14:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] devmem: introduce size_inside_page() Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-12 14:41 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-09-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] devmem: cleanup unxlate_dev_mem_ptr() calls Wu Fengguang
2009-09-12 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-12 14:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] /dev/mem cleanups and bug fix Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090912144157.GB6511@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.