From: Mark Smith <lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
gospo@redhat.com, gregory.v.rose@intel.com,
donald.c.skidmore@intel.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] etherdevice.h: random_ether_addr update
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:17:52 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090913131752.462abc01@opy.nosense.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252802686.4400.19.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:44:46 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 10:03 +0930, Mark Smith wrote:
> > Hmm, probably didn't make my point all that clear. IOW, anything that
> > can contribute to avoiding duplicate mac addresses is worth it in my
> > opinion, when compared to the time (usually hours) involved in
> > troubleshooting duplicate mac addresses.
>
> Avoiding an initial octet of "02", which is partially
> assigned to 3Com and others, might be useful.
>
I wouldn't necessarily disagree. I would say that if that path was
taken, then you'd probably also want to be avoiding all the other
well known mac addresses that do or can fall within the locally
assigned range e.g. DECnet 0xAA addresses, Microsoft's use of
02:01:00:00:00:00 and similar addresses for their Network Load
Balancing software, the unicast version of the CF:00:00:00:00:00
multicast address use for ECTP, the unicast version of the
33:33:xx:xx:xx:xx IPv6 ND multicast ranges etc.
Having thought about this issue a bit before, another thought might be
to have somebody get the Linux kernel it's own OUI, and then have
addresses randomly selected out of that. As my day job is networking,
I'd find some value in being able to see a well known OUI for Linux
randomly generated addresses, rather than the complete randomness that
is the case now.
The drawback there is that there are then only 24 bits octets of
randomness in the addresses that each host can independently choose to
use, which isn't anywhere near the as random as the 2^46 the LA address
space provides. For most ethernet segments, 24 bits of randomness might
be ok, however some of the very large metro ethernet networks are
starting to carry 16000+ MAC addresses, all within the same, very
controlled broadcast domain.
> Not drawing from entropy I think useful, but it's debatable.
>
>
I'm guessing there are other things in the kernel that would be taking
away far more entropy, far more often. IIRC, TCP connection initial
sequence number selection would be one example.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-13 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 1:48 [net-next PATCH] igb: Use Intel OUI for VF MAC addresses Jeff Kirsher
2009-09-11 2:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-11 3:02 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-11 19:15 ` David Miller
2009-09-11 20:20 ` [net-next PATCH] etherdevice.h: random_ether_addr update Joe Perches
2009-09-11 20:44 ` [net-next PATCH V2] " Joe Perches
2009-09-11 21:13 ` Rose, Gregory V
2009-09-11 21:15 ` [net-next PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-12 0:57 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-13 0:14 ` Mark Smith
2009-09-13 0:33 ` Mark Smith
2009-09-13 0:44 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-13 3:47 ` Mark Smith [this message]
2009-09-13 6:09 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-13 6:39 ` Mark Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090913131752.462abc01@opy.nosense.org \
--to=lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.c.skidmore@intel.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=gregory.v.rose@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.