Re: [PATCH] add warnings enum-to-int and int-to-enum

[Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>]

On Thursday 03 of September 2009 22:02:06 Christopher Li wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Kamil Dudka<kdudka@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Two personalities are still not so many ... have you ever looked to the
> > gcc code? :-)
>
> That is why I don't want to start a trend.
>
> > I didn't say hard, but actually not useful from my point of view. If it's
> > easy for you to split my patch to the two pieces, you are welcome to have
> > a go at that. We can still wait for opinion of the original authors.
> > Perhaps they can bring some light to this problem.
>
> Fair enough .I need to spend more time to digest this patch.

Any progress here? I wouldn't like this to become another downstream patch.

I work on a generic layer [1] for processing C sources (for now) supporting 
SPARSE and gcc 4.5 plug-in as sources. The gcc plug-in [2] now works fairly 
well and I am going to make the SPARSE client fully equivalent to the 
plug-in. This will probably need a few more tiny patches for SPARSE
to implement what's missing.

Is the upstream interested to make SPARSE more useful as a library?

Kamil

[1]http://dudka.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=tools;a=blob_plain;f=sl/code_listener.h
[2]http://dudka.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=tools;a=blob_plain;f=sl/slplug.c