From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
To: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC: handle queue_depth adjustments because of QUEUE_FULLs in scsi_error.c
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:21:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914112100.GA27084@schmichrtp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251914477.29277.101.camel@vi2.jf.intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:01:17AM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
> > You can/should probably also pick up Christop's stuff too for him (zfcp
> > patches).
>
> Christof, I'm fine picking up your patch also, let me know if that is
> not fine with you.
Pick up the patch, that is ok with me. I guess it makes most sense to
apply this in one run.
I have not seen the patches in scsi-misc yet. Will this go into 2.6.32?
--
Christof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-26 18:03 [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC: handle queue_depth adjustments because of QUEUE_FULLs in scsi_error.c Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] scsi-ml: modify change_queue_depth to take in reason why it is being called Vasu Dev
2009-08-27 10:21 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-08-27 21:09 ` Vasu Dev
2009-08-28 16:56 ` Mike Christie
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] scsi error: have scsi-ml call change_queue_depth to handle QUEUE_FULL Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] drivers: convert drivers setting the change_queue_depth callback Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-08-26 21:50 ` Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 21:55 ` Mike Christie
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] drivers: convert fc drivers calling scsi_track_queue_full Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] scsi: updates sdev to add queue_depth ramp up code Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] scsi: adds sdev->queue_ramp_up_period to sysfs Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] scsi: add common queue_depth ramp up code Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] fcoe, libfc: fix an libfc issue with queue ramp down in libfc Vasu Dev
2009-08-26 18:04 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] libfc: adds queue_depth ramp up to libfc Vasu Dev
2009-08-27 10:19 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-08-27 20:56 ` Vasu Dev
2009-08-28 10:44 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-09-02 18:00 ` Vasu Dev
2009-09-01 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC: handle queue_depth adjustments because of QUEUE_FULLs in scsi_error.c Vasu Dev
2009-09-02 1:46 ` Mike Christie
2009-09-02 18:01 ` Vasu Dev
2009-09-03 8:17 ` Swen Schillig
2009-09-14 11:21 ` Christof Schmitt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090914112100.GA27084@schmichrtp \
--to=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=vasu.dev@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.