All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 regression in 2.6.31 ?
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:13:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090915081354.GA10037@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090914093128.4d709ff6@nehalam>

On 14-09-2009 18:31, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:55:05 +0200
> Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:57:03 +0200
>> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephan von Krawczynski a A~(c)crit :
>>>> Hello all,
...
>>> rp_filter - INTEGER
>>>         0 - No source validation.
>>>         1 - Strict mode as defined in RFC3704 Strict Reverse Path
>>>             Each incoming packet is tested against the FIB and if the interface
>>>             is not the best reverse path the packet check will fail.
>>>             By default failed packets are discarded.
>>>         2 - Loose mode as defined in RFC3704 Loose Reverse Path
>>>             Each incoming packet's source address is also tested against the FIB
>>>             and if the source address is not reachable via any interface
>>>             the packet check will fail.
...
> RP filter did not work correctly in 2.6.30. The code added to to the loose
> mode caused a bug; the rp_filter value was being computed as:
>   rp_filter = interface_value & all_value;
> So in order to get reverse path filter both would have to be set.
> 
> In 2.6.31 this was change to:
>    rp_filter = max(interface_value, all_value);
> 
> This was the intended behaviour, if user asks all interfaces to have rp
> filtering turned on, then set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter = 1
> or to turn on just one interface, set it for just that interface.

Alas this max() formula handles also cases where both values are set
and it doesn't look very natural/"user friendly" to me. Especially
with something like this: all_value = 2; interface_value = 1
Why would anybody care to bother with interface_value in such a case?

"All" suggests "default" in this context, so I'd rather expect
something like:
    rp_filter = interface_value ? : all_value;
which gives "the inteded behaviour" too, plus more...

We'd only need to add e.g.:
 0 - Default ("all") validation. (No source validation if "all" is 0).
 3 - No source validation on this interface.

Jarek P.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-15  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-14 13:09 ipv4 regression in 2.6.31 ? Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-09-14 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-14 15:10   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-09-14 15:21     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-14 15:55   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-09-14 16:10     ` Paravirtualization Richard B. Johnson
2009-09-14 16:10     ` ipv4 regression in 2.6.31 ? Eric Dumazet
2009-09-14 16:31     ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-15  0:01       ` Julian Anastasov
2009-09-15  8:13       ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-09-15 22:57         ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-16  5:23           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-16 17:00             ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-09-18  8:30               ` Stephan von Krawczynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090915081354.GA10037@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.