From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for mempolicy based management.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916102124.GC1993@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0909141421540.22563@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:28:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > > On PPC64, the parameters behave differently. I couldn't convince it to
> > > create more than one NUMA node. On x86-64, the NUMA nodes appeared to
> > > exist and would be visible on /proc/buddyinfo for example but the sysfs
> > > directories for the fake nodes were not created so nr_hugepages couldn't
> > > be examined on a per-node basis for example.
> > >
> >
> > I don't know anything about the ppc64 fake NUMA, but the sysfs node
> > directories should certainly be created on x86_64. I'll look into it
> > because that's certainly a bug. Thanks.
> >
>
> This works on my machine just fine.
>
> For example, with numa=fake=8:
>
> $ ls /sys/devices/system/node
> has_cpu has_normal_memory node0 node1 node2 node3 node4
> node5 node6 node7 online possible
>
> $ ls /sys/devices/system/node/node3
> cpu4 cpu5 cpu6 cpu7 cpulist cpumap distance meminfo
> numastat scan_unevictable_pages
>
> I don't see how this could differ if bootmem is setting up the nodes
> correctly, which dmesg | grep "^Bootmem setup node" would reveal.
>
> The defconfig disables CONFIG_NUMA_EMU now, though, so perhaps it got
> turned off by accident in your kernel?
>
I don't think so because my recollection is that the nodes existed
according to meminfo and buddyinfo but not the sysfs files.
Unfortunately I can't remember the reproduction scenario. I thought it
was on mmotm-2009-08-27-16-51 on a particularly machine but when I went
to reproduce, it didn't even boot so somewhere along the line I busted
things.
> Let me know if there's any abnormalities with your particular setup.
>
Will try reproducing on more recent mmotm and see if anything odd falls
out.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-28 16:03 [PATCH 0/6] hugetlb: V5 constrain allocation/free based on task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 18:39 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 18:39 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-01 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-03 19:22 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 19:22 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 20:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 20:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 20:49 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 20:49 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] hugetlb: introduce alloc_nodemask_of_node Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-01 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 16:42 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-01 16:42 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 18:34 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 18:34 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 20:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-01 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-03 19:52 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 19:52 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 20:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 20:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 21:02 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 21:02 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-04 14:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-04 14:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for mempolicy based management Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 20:07 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 20:07 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-03 21:09 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 21:09 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-03 21:25 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-08 10:44 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 10:44 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 19:51 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-08 20:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 20:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 20:18 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-08 21:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 21:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 22:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-09 8:16 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-09 8:16 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-09 20:44 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-10 12:26 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-10 12:26 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-11 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-11 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-14 13:33 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-14 14:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-14 14:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-14 15:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-14 15:41 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-14 19:15 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-14 19:15 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-15 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-15 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-14 19:14 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-14 19:14 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-14 21:28 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-16 10:21 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-09-03 20:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-04 15:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-09 16:31 [PATCH 0/6] hugetlb: V6 constrain allocation/free based on task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for mempolicy based management Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916102124.GC1993@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.